- To do that we:
In reality, any prediction relies on multiple features, so we advance from single-feature to 2-feature linear regression; we chose 2 features to keep visualization and comprehension simple, but the concept generalizes to any number of features.

- In the single-feature scenario, we had to use linear regression to create a straight line to help us predict the outcome ‘house size’, for cases where we did not have datapoints.
- Recall for a single-feature (see left of image below), the linear regression model outcome (y) has a weight (W), a placeholder (x) for the ‘house size’ feature, and a bias (b).
- In TF, this multiplication would be:
Note: The x representations in the feature matrix become more complex, i.e., we use x1.1, x1.2, instead of x1, x2, etc. because the feature matrix (the one in the middle) has expanded from representing a single datapoint of n-features (1 row x n columns) to representing m datapoints with n-features (m rows x n columns), so we extended x

, e.g., x1, to x . - In TF, they would be written as:
In TF, with our x, and W represented in matrices, regardless of the number of features our model has or the number of datapoints we want to handle, it can be simplified to:

We do a side-by-side comparison to summarize the change from single to multi-feature linear regression:

We illustrated the concept of multi-feature linear regression, and showed how we extend our model and TF code from single to 2-feature linear regression models, which is generalizable to n-feature models.

This post is the third entry in a series dedicated to introducing newcomers to TensorFlow in the gentlest possible manner. This entry progresses to multi-feature linear regression.

@kdnuggets: *The Gentlest Introduction to #Tensorflow – Part 3 #NeuralNetworks #MachineLearning*

This post is the third entry in a series dedicated to introducing newcomers to TensorFlow in the gentlest possible manner. This entry progresses to multi-feature linear regression.

By Soon Hin Khor, Co-organizer for Tokyo Tensorflow Meetup.

The premise of the previous articles was: given any house size (square meters/sqm), which is the feature, we want to predict the house price ($), the outcome. To do that we:

We find a straight line (linear regression) that ‘best-fits’ the data points that we have. The ‘best-fit’ is when the linear regression line ensures that the difference between the actual data points (gray dots) and the predicted values (gray dots interpolated on to the straight line), which, in other words, is the sum of multiple blue lines, is minimized.

With this straight line we can predict any value of house

In reality, any prediction relies on multiple features, so we advance from single-feature to 2-feature linear regression; we chose 2 features to keep visualization and comprehension simple, but the concept generalizes to any number of features.

We introduce a new feature, ‘Rooms’ (number of units in the house). When collecting datapoints, we must now collect values for the new feature ‘rooms’ on top of the existing feature ‘house size’, as well as the corresponding outcome ‘house price’.

Our chart becomes 3-dimensional.

Our goal then becomes predicting ‘house price’, given ‘rooms’, and ‘house size’ (see image below).

In the single-feature scenario, we had to use linear regression to create a straight line to help us predict the outcome ‘house size’, for cases where we did not have datapoints. In a 2-feature scenario, we can also employ linear regression, but to create a plane (instead of a straight line) to help us predict (see image below).

Recall for a single-feature (see left of image below), the linear regression model outcome (y) has a weight (W), a placeholder (x) for the ‘house size’ feature, and a bias (b).

For 2-feature (see right of image below), we introduce another weight, which we call W2, and another placeholder, x2 to hold the ‘rooms’ feature value.

When we perform linear regression, gradient descent helps us learn the additional weight W2, on top of the learning W, b as previously discussed.

Quick Review

Our TF code for single-feature linear regression consists of 3 parts (see image below):

Constructing the model (blue part)

Constructing the cost function based on the model (red part)

Minimizing the cost function using gradient descent (green part)

Tensorflow for 2-feature Linear Regression

The change to support 2-feature linear regression equation (explained above) in TF code is shown in red.

Note this way of adding new features is inefficient; as the number of features grow, the number of required variables and placeholders increases. In reality models have many more features, which worsens this problem. How can we represent features efficiently?

First, let us generalize representing a 2-feature model to an n-feature one:

It turns out that the complex n-feature formula can be simplified in the world of matrices, and matrices are in-built into TF for these reasons:

Data can be represented in multi-dimensions, which fits the way we want to represent a datapoint with n features (below left, also known as the feature matrix) and a model with n weights (below right, also known as the weight matrix)

In TF, they would be written as:

NOTE: For W we use tf.zeros, which initializes all W1, W2, …, Wn to zeros.

Mathematically matrix multiplication is a sum of multiplications (just accept this as part of mathematics); thus naturally the matrix multiplication between the features (the one in the middle) and weights (the one on the right) matrices gives you the outcome (the one on the left), which is equivalent to first part of the n-feature linear regression formula (described above), i.e., without the biases

In TF, this multiplication would be:

Matrix multiplication between a multi-row feature matrix (each row representing a datapoint’s n features), returns multi-row outcomes (each row representing the outcome/prediction (without bias added) of each datapoint); thus a single matrix multiplication can apply the linear regression formula to multiple datapoints to produce multiple predictions, one for each datapoints, at a single go (see below)!

Note: The x representations in the feature matrix become more complex, i.e., we use x1.1, x1.2, instead of x1, x2, etc. because the feature matrix (the one in the middle) has expanded from representing a single datapoint of n-features (1 row x n columns) to representing m datapoints with n-features (m rows x n columns), so we extended x

, e.g., x1, to x . , e.g., x1.1, where n is the feature number and m is the datapoint number. In TF, they would be written as:

Finally, adding a constant to the outcome matrix results in the constant being added to every row in the matrix

In TF, with our x, and W represented in matrices, regardless of the number of features our model has or the number of datapoints we want to handle, it can be simplified to:

We do a side-by-side comparison to summarize the change from single to multi-feature linear regression:

We illustrated the concept of multi-feature linear regression, and showed how we extend our model and TF code from single to 2-feature linear regression models, which is generalizable to n-feature models. We conclude by presenting a cheatsheet for multi-feature TF linear regression model.

Coming Up Next

We will present the concepts of logistic regression, cross-entropy, and softmax, which will enable us to fully understand Tensorflow’s official beginner’s tutorial on MNIST.

Github: TF for multi-feature linear regression without matrices

Github: TF for multi-feature linear regression with matrices

The slides on Slideshare (1–43)

The video on YouTube (0:00 to 7:18)

Bio: Soon Hin Khor, Ph.D is using tech to make the world more caring, and responsible. Contributor of ruby-tensorflow. Co-organizer for Tokyo Tensorflow meetup.

Original. Reposted with permission.

Related: